These tools competes with
Augment CodevsCursor
Enterprise AI coding assistant with deep codebase context versus AI-native code editor
Compare interactively in Explore →Choose Augment Code when…
- •You're on a large team with a complex, multi-repo codebase
- •You need AI that actually understands your full codebase context
- •You want fewer hallucinations and higher accuracy than Copilot
Choose Cursor when…
- •You want a full AI-native editor replacing VS Code
- •You need multi-file agent mode
- •You work alone or in a small team
Side-by-side comparison
Field
Augment Code
Cursor
Category
Coding Assistants
Coding Assistants
Type
Commercial
Commercial
Free Tier
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
Pricing Plans
Team: $30/user/moEnterprise: Custom
Pro: $20/moBusiness: $40/user/mo
GitHub Stars
—
—
Health
—
—
Augment Code
Enterprise-focused AI coding assistant with a proprietary Context Engine that indexes 400K+ file codebases. Claims 70.6% on SWE-bench Verified and significantly fewer hallucinations than Copilot. Designed for large engineering teams with complex, multi-repo codebases.
Cursor
VS Code fork with deep AI editing, multi-file context, and a powerful agent mode. The most popular AI editor by mindshare.
Shared Connections1 tools both integrate with
Only Augment Code (1)
Cursor
Only Cursor (28)
WindsurfGitHub MCPDevinClineLangSmithLangfuseLangGraphLlamaIndexPlaywright MCPQodo (CodiumAI)
Explore the full AI landscape
See how Augment Code and Cursor fit into the bigger picture — 235 tools, 543 relationships, all mapped.