These tools competes with
Augment CodevsCursor
Enterprise AI coding assistant with deep codebase context versus AI-native code editor
Compare interactively in Explore →Choose Augment Code when…
- •You're on a large team with a complex, multi-repo codebase
- •You need AI that actually understands your full codebase context
- •You want fewer hallucinations and higher accuracy than Copilot
Choose Cursor when…
- •You want a full AI-native editor replacing VS Code
- •You need multi-file agent mode
- •You work alone or in a small team
Side-by-side comparison
Field
Augment Code
Cursor
Category
Coding Assistants
Coding Assistants
Type
Commercial
Commercial
Free Tier
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
Pricing Plans
Team: $30/user/moEnterprise: Custom
Pro: $20/moBusiness: $40/user/mo
GitHub Stars
—
—
Health
—
—
Augment Code
Enterprise-focused AI coding assistant with a proprietary Context Engine that indexes 400K+ file codebases. Claims 70.6% on SWE-bench Verified and significantly fewer hallucinations than Copilot. Designed for large engineering teams with complex, multi-repo codebases.
Cursor
VS Code fork with deep AI editing, multi-file context, and a powerful agent mode. The most popular AI editor by mindshare.
Shared Connections1 tool both integrate with
Only Augment Code (1)
Cursor
Only Cursor (28)
WindsurfGitHub MCPLangSmithLangfuseLangGraphLlamaIndexPlaywright MCPQodo (CodiumAI)ClineDevin
Explore the full AI landscape
See how Augment Code and Cursor fit into the bigger picture — 256 tools, 553 relationships, all mapped.