AIchitect
StacksGraphBuilderSimulateCompareGenomeActivityPulse
Frontend and full-stack teams who live in TypeScript and refuse to introduce a Python service
The Situation

Your team ships TypeScript. Someone suggested LangChain. You've decided you'd rather not introduce a Python microservice just to call an LLM.

TypeScript-Only AI Stack

Full AI product capability — agents, RAG, observability — without a single line of Python.

Try in Builder →
Intermediate$100–400/moTypeScriptfull-stackno Python
Why this stack

The Vercel AI SDK makes every LLM call type-safe — streaming responses, tool definitions, and structured outputs all carry TypeScript types so integration bugs surface at compile time, not in production. Mastra builds agent workflows on top of that foundation with typed memory primitives, so agent state is part of your type system rather than an opaque blob. Qdrant's TypeScript client means retrieval results arrive with known shapes too. Langfuse completes the chain with typed trace events. The point isn't developer preference: it's that type safety propagates through the entire AI call stack, giving you the same correctness guarantees on AI code that you have on the rest of your backend.

Tradeoff

TypeScript AI tooling is 6–12 months behind its Python equivalents in feature depth. Complex RAG patterns and fine-tuning pipelines will eventually force a Python boundary. Some research-grade tooling has no TypeScript port at all.

Not in this stack
✗LangChain— Primary SDK is Python-first; TypeScript port lags significantly behind
✗LangGraph— Python-native orchestration — Mastra covers the same ground in TypeScript
✗LlamaIndex— TypeScript version is a second-class citizen compared to the Python library
Cursor
Vercel AI SDK
Mastra
Qdrant
Langfuse
OpenAI API
Press enter or space to select a node.You can then use the arrow keys to move the node around. Press delete to remove it and escape to cancel.
Press enter or space to select an edge. You can then press delete to remove it or escape to cancel.