These tools competes with

ComposiovsSmithery

Managed MCP infrastructure with 500+ pre-built integrations and auth versus MCP server registry and deployment platform

Compare interactively in Explore →

Choose Composio when…

  • •You want a managed MCP layer with pre-built SaaS integrations
  • •You do not want to operate OAuth flows for every tool
  • •You want centralised auth and observability across many MCP servers

Choose Smithery when…

  • •You want to discover and install community MCP servers
  • •You're browsing what tools Claude can connect to
  • •You want a marketplace for MCP server packages

Side-by-side comparison

Field
Composio
Smithery
Category
MCP Servers
MCP Servers
Type
Commercial
Commercial
Free Tier
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
Pricing Plans
Pro: From $49/moEnterprise: Custom
—
GitHub Stars
—
—
Health
●85 — Active
—

Composio

Managed MCP platform with 500+ pre-built integrations to SaaS apps (Slack, Notion, Linear, Stripe, GitHub, etc.) and managed OAuth/auth flows. Competes head-on with Smithery and Glama for the managed-MCP slot.

Website ↗GitHub ↗

Smithery

Discover, deploy, and manage MCP servers. Registry of 2,000+ community MCP servers with one-click deployment.

Website ↗

Shared Connections2 tools both integrate with

MCP SDK (TypeScript)Claude Code

Only Composio (1)

Smithery

Only Smithery (4)

E2BCursorMCP.soComposio

Explore the full AI landscape

See how Composio and Smithery fit into the bigger picture — 235 tools, 543 relationships, all mapped.

Open in Explore →