These tools competes with

SmitheryvsComposio

MCP server registry and deployment platform versus Managed MCP infrastructure with 500+ pre-built integrations and auth

Compare interactively in Explore →

Choose Smithery when…

  • •You want to discover and install community MCP servers
  • •You're browsing what tools Claude can connect to
  • •You want a marketplace for MCP server packages

Choose Composio when…

  • •You want a managed MCP layer with pre-built SaaS integrations
  • •You do not want to operate OAuth flows for every tool
  • •You want centralised auth and observability across many MCP servers

Side-by-side comparison

Field
Smithery
Composio
Category
MCP Servers
MCP Servers
Type
Commercial
Commercial
Free Tier
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
Pricing Plans
—
Pro: From $49/moEnterprise: Custom
GitHub Stars
—
—
Health
—
●85 — Active

Smithery

Discover, deploy, and manage MCP servers. Registry of 2,000+ community MCP servers with one-click deployment.

Website ↗

Composio

Managed MCP platform with 500+ pre-built integrations to SaaS apps (Slack, Notion, Linear, Stripe, GitHub, etc.) and managed OAuth/auth flows. Competes head-on with Smithery and Glama for the managed-MCP slot.

Website ↗GitHub ↗

Shared Connections2 tools both integrate with

MCP SDK (TypeScript)Claude Code

Only Smithery (4)

E2BCursorMCP.soComposio

Only Composio (1)

Smithery

Explore the full AI landscape

See how Smithery and Composio fit into the bigger picture — 235 tools, 543 relationships, all mapped.

Open in Explore →