AIchitect
StacksGraphBuilderSimulateCompareGenomeActivityPulse
235 tools · 33 stacks

AI tools are all over the place. This is the full landscape — 247 tools across 21 categories, mapped and connected. Ready to narrow it down? Build your stack →

Team size

Budget

Use case

Stage

Cluster

Stack Layers
What are you building and how is it defined?
How do you write and ship code?
How does your AI think and act?
Which models and infrastructure power it?
How do you build, observe, and extend it?
Browse all categories →
These tools competes with
Google Antigravity
vs
Kiro

Choose Google Antigravity when…

  • •You want a Gemini 3-native agentic IDE
  • •You are aligned to Google Cloud and want first-party AI tooling
  • •You want parallel-agent execution inside the editor

Choose Kiro when…

  • •You want a spec-first workflow inside the IDE
  • •You are aligned to AWS and want a Bedrock-backed agentic editor
  • •You need plan-then-execute coding rather than free-form chat
Field
Google Antigravity
Kiro
Category
Coding Assistants
Spec-Driven Dev
Type
SaaS
SaaS
Free Tier
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
Plans
Free: FreePro: $20/mo
Pro: $19/moBusiness: $39/user/mo
Stars
—
—
Health
—
—
Trajectory
— not enough data
— not enough data

Google Antigravity

Google's first-party agentic IDE, launched November 2025 with Gemini 3 and an agent-orchestration model that runs multiple agents in parallel. Hit ~6% developer adoption within four months of launch.

Kiro

AWS's VS Code-based agentic IDE built around spec-driven development. Powered by Claude Sonnet with strong refactor and plan-first workflows. Hit waitlist on launch in July 2025 and is now a top-tier comparison point alongside Cursor and Claude Code.

Google Antigravity Website ↗
Kiro Website ↗

Shared Connections (1)

Cursor

Only Google Antigravity (2)

KiroGoogle Gemini API

Only Kiro (3)

Google AntigravityClaude CodeSpec Kit
See full comparison in Explore →